D-202 · Completed
Treated an unspecified location policy as remote
Decision made
Marked a hybrid-only role as meeting the remote-work preference.
Context
A role looked relevant, but the employer did not specify whether remote work was available outside its office region.
Recorded reasoning
The team described itself as distributed. The agent inferred that fully remote work would therefore be allowed.
Supporting evidence2 sources
Employer role description
“Hybrid: three days in our Seattle office.”
Agent comparison note
“Distributed team; likely flexible on location.” No corroborating policy was recorded.
Criteria at decision time2 historical snapshots
v1 · applied at decision time
Every material claim used to include, exclude, or recommend an option must cite a source and the observation it supports. A missing source is an evidence gap, not evidence of absence. Separate the agent’s interpretation from the source observation.
v1 · applied at decision time
Label unresolved facts and assumptions wherever they materially influence the decision. Explain what is unknown, why it matters, and what evidence would resolve it. Escalate uncertainty that changes an owner preference or creates an external commitment.
Fixed snapshots; subsequent edits do not change this decision.